⚡Under $0.50/hr🧠VRAM Estimator⚖Compare GPUs🎁Free LLM APIs🎯Model Index
GuideModel Optimization1 min read

Quantization Formats Explained: FP8 vs INT4 vs AWQ for LLM Serving

Choose the right quantization format for your workload: INT4 for consumer GPUs, FP8 for datacenter H100, and AWQ for optimized throughput.

By OpenGPU Radar Engineering — ML Platform Engineer··
⚡ Quick Answer

Choose the right quantization format for your workload: INT4 for consumer GPUs, FP8 for datacenter H100, and AWQ for optimized throughput.

Live Hardware Telemetry

Compute Impact

VRAM Delta
FP8: 2x compression vs FP16; INT4: 4x compression; AWQ: 3-4x with better quality retention
Pricing Impact
INT4 cuts VRAM 75% enabling consumer GPU serving; FP8 unlocks native Tensor Core acceleration on H100
Workload Shift
INT4 fits models on consumer GPUs; FP8 maintains quality while doubling throughput on datacenter hardware

FP8 Precision

FP8 uses 1 byte per weight element, halving VRAM vs FP16. Native Tensor Core support on Hopper GPUs delivers 2x throughput at minimal quality loss.

INT4/AWQ

INT4 quantization uses 0.5 bytes per weight. AWQ (Activation-Aware Weight Quantization) preserves quality better than naive INT4 by protecting high-magnitude weights.

Methodology

VRAM measurements derived from model-registry.json minVramFp16Gb and minVramInt4Gb fields. Throughput figures from gpu-specs.ts fp8Tflops measurements.

What should I do next?