NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper vs NVIDIA H200 SXM5
Side-by-side comparison of NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper (96 GB VRAM, 4.0 TB/s + 512 GB/s) and NVIDIA H200 SXM5 (141 GB VRAM, 4.8 TB/s). Compare specs, compute throughput, and workload sizing for LLM inference.
Decision Summary
| Spec | NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper | NVIDIA H200 SXM5 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 96GB/144GB HBM3 + 480GB LPDDR5X | 141GB HBM3e |
| Memory Bandwidth | 4.0 TB/s + 512 GB/s | 4.8 TB/s |
| FP8 TFLOPS | 1,979 | 1,979 |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 989 | 989 |
| Interconnect | NVLink-C2C (900 GB/s) | NVLink 4.0 (900 GB/s) |
| TDP | 1000W | 700W |
| Recommended Quantization | FP8 native โ CPU-GPU coherence eliminates explicit offloading | FP8 / FP4 native |
Compare for a Workload
Configure a workload to see how each selected GPU performs. Calculations are deterministic estimates based on architectural specifications.
Configure workload parameters above and click "Calculate VRAM Requirement" to see results.
Cloud Provider Pricing
Current spot and on-demand rates across providers for NVIDIA GH200 Grace Hopper and NVIDIA H200 SXM5.
Featured GPU Pricing Pages
80GB HBM3 โข 3.35 TB/s โข NVLink 4.0
40GB HBM2 โข 1.55 TB/s โข NVLink 3.0
Verified spot rates & reserved pricing
24GB GDDR6 โข 0.62 TB/s โข PCIe 4.0
24GB GDDR6X โข 0.94 TB/s โข PCIe 4.0
16GB GDDR6 โข 0.32 TB/s โข PCIe 3.0
Prices verified daily from Spheron, RunPod, Vast.ai, and Lambda Labs APIs.
Microarchitecture & Interconnect
Related GPU Comparisons
Explore canonical side-by-side comparisons for this hardware tier.